Beaton v Wray-Watts

[2003] WASCA 314

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Firearms offences
3. › Possession of prohibited firearm
4. › Category D firearm
5. › Whether dealer's licence or repairer's licence authorises possession
6. › Firearms Act 1973 (WA), ss 6, 16, 19
7. › Firearms Regulations 1974 (WA), reg 26
1. Administrative Law
2. › Delegated legislation
3. › Validity of regulations
4. › Whether regulation ultra vires enabling Act
5. › Whether regulation creating offence duplicating existing statutory offence is valid
6. › Firearms Act 1973 (WA), s 6
7. › Firearms Regulations 1974 (WA), reg 26
1. Criminal Law
2. › Firearms offences
3. › Definition of firearm
4. › Disabled firearm
5. › Whether alteration in construction or fabric can make weapon capable of discharging missile
6. › Distinction between alteration and manufacture
7. › Firearms Act 1973 (WA), s 4
1. Criminal Law
2. › Possession
3. › Knowledge as element of possession
4. › Circumstantial evidence of knowledge
5. › Whether inference of knowledge was only rational inference
6. › Appeal
7. › Whether magistrate's finding of credibility should be disturbed

Quick Take

A disabled military firearm that has been modified to prevent firing remains a 'firearm' under s 4 of the Firearms Act 1973 (WA) where the modifications can be reversed by alteration rather than manufacture. A dealer's licence or repairer's licence does not authorise possession of Category D firearms, which require specific licensing. Regulation 26 of the Firearms Regulations 1974 (WA) validly creates a separate offence with higher penalties notwithstanding the existence of the general offence under s 19.