Where a successful party's own conduct has brought about the need for proceedings and generated their length and complexity, a costs order in that party's favour may constitute an error in principle warranting appellate intervention. The probate costs analogy — where a testator's conduct in creating doubt about a will's validity may justify awarding costs to the unsuccessful challenger — extends to non-probate proceedings where the successful party's conduct created the litigation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.