R v Al Jenabi [2004] NTSC 44 — Evidence — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Al Jenabi
[2004] NTSC 44
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+1 more
Criminal Law
›
evidence
›
discretion to exclude
›
reliability
›
unfairness discretion
›
public policy
›
probative value weighed against prejudicial effect
Evidence
›
whether admissible
›
whether proper identification made on photo board
›
whether highly prejudicial to accused
›
whether legislation complied with
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 3, s 3ZO, s 3ZO(1), s 3ZO(2), s 3ZO(2)(f), s 3ZM(6)(1); Evidence Act (NT) s 26L; Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 232A
Eyewitness Identification: Why So Many Mistakes?, [name withheld] (1984) 58 ALJ 509 at 513
Case Details
Citation
[2004] NTSC 44
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works