Under s 82(1) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), a finding that contravening conduct 'at least played a minor part' in inducing a decision is sufficient to establish causation, even where the trial judge has made adverse credibility findings against the plaintiffs and found that other factors (including the influence of a third party and the plaintiffs' own misconceptions) also contributed to the decision. An admitted legal practitioner who appears as a litigant in person cannot recover costs assessed as counsel fees for work that would have been performed by counsel; the Cachia v Hanes anomalous exception is confined to solicitor's work and should not be extended.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.