The use of child pornography to attempt to debauch a victim of incest may be reflected either as a circumstance of aggravation of the incest counts or through an increased and partially cumulative sentence on the pornography count, but not both. A total effective sentence of seven years for serious incest involving representative counts, absence of remorse, and use of pornography to debauch the victim was manifestly inadequate; nine years (discounted for double jeopardy) was substituted. The double jeopardy discount on Crown appeal resentencing should be applied to the total effective sentence rather than to individual sentences.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 35 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 35 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.