A trial judge who accepts the evidence of witnesses while stating there is 'no reason to reject' their evidence, when there are clear reasons open to do so, and who fails to address critical documentary evidence that is inconsistent with the finding made, will have the decision set aside for inadequate reasons. However, where the evidence is not incontrovertible and credibility findings are required, the appellate court will order a retrial rather than substitute its own findings.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.