A supporting affidavit under s 459G(3) that goes beyond a bare assertion of a genuine dispute by identifying a specific basis for the dispute (such as a pending government review) meets the minimum content requirements, even if it does not detail all the evidence. A creditor's agreement to withdraw a statutory demand, subsequently reneged upon, constitutes 'some other reason' to set aside the demand under s 459J(1)(b), particularly where the creditor is a government entity expected to observe the highest standards in its dealings. The Court left open the question of whether relief is available where a creditor's representation induces a company not to apply to set aside the demand at all within the 21-day period.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 60 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 60 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.