Where the substantive dispute concerns real property, mortgage and loan agreements governed by the law of another State, between parties based in that State, with dispute resolution clauses directed to that State's courts, and the jurisdictional connection to the forum court is undermined by evidence contradicting the basis for local jurisdiction, the interests of justice under s 5(2)(iii) of the Cross-vesting Act require transfer to the Supreme Court of that other State.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.