A person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who attacks another under an intense delusion that the victim is about to kill them may be found incapable of understanding that what they were doing was wrong, even though they were capable of knowing what they were doing (i.e., using a weapon to inflict harm). The distinction between knowing what one is doing and understanding that it is wrong is critical to the s 320 defence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.