Mere unawareness of a matter material to a party's interests in a transaction does not constitute a special disadvantage for the purposes of the equitable doctrine of unconscionable dealing. There is an important difference between a person under a condition or circumstance disabling them from making a sound judgment and a person who is able to make a judgment but fails to make a sound one due to incomplete knowledge or bad advice. Where a party has received legal advice, even if that advice was deficient, the consequences of bad advice should not readily be spread from the adviser to the other party to the transaction on the basis that the party was under a special disadvantage.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 21 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 21 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.