Where a co-accused's defence of duress requires adducing highly prejudicial character and criminal history evidence against the applicant — evidence the Crown has no intention of leading — the prejudice is not reasonably capable of being countered by judicial directions and a separate trial should be ordered. The contrast between one accused's criminal record and another's entitlement to a good character direction is not alone sufficient to warrant separate trials but is an accumulating factor.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.