Mayes v Tasmania

[2005] TASSC 126

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Primary Industry - Fish - Offences - Other cases - Possession of fish with value exceeding $5,000 without lawful excuse - Whether holding of licence constitutes lawful excuse - Validity and meaning of regulation prohibiting possession of more than 20 abalone.
1. Living Marine Resources Management Act 1995 (Tas), s264(1).
1. Living Marine Resources Management Amendment Act 2000 (Tas), s13(1)(a).
1. Fisheries (Abalone) Rules 2000 (Tas), rr17(1)(c), 20(3)(b), 35.

Citation[2005] TASSC 126

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in