Varnavides v Victorian Civil & Administrative Tribunal & Anor

(2005) 12 VR 1; [2005] VSCA 231

Victorian Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Contempt
3. › Contempt of statutory tribunal
4. › Sentence
5. › Power to impose suspended sentence
6. › Whether statutory tribunal has power to suspend sentence of imprisonment
7. › Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), ss 130, 137, 138
1. Criminal Law
2. › Contempt
3. › Contempt of statutory tribunal
4. › Sentence
5. › Self-executing order for imprisonment
6. › Whether order for imprisonment operative upon future uncertain event without judicial determination is lawful
1. Criminal Law
2. › Contempt
3. › Contempt of statutory tribunal
4. › Sentence
5. › Manifest excess
6. › Whether sentence manifestly excessive having regard to nature of contempt and personal circumstances
1. Criminal Law
2. › Contempt
3. › Contempt of statutory tribunal
4. › Powers of statutory tribunal to punish for contempt
5. › Whether powers strictly limited to terms of statute
6. › Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), s 137

Quick Take

VCAT's power to punish for contempt under s 137 of the VCAT Act is strictly limited to immediate committal to prison or a fine; it has no power to impose suspended sentences of imprisonment, whether under s 137 or the incidental powers in s 130. Self-executing orders for imprisonment that operate upon a future uncertain event without further judicial determination are impermissible. The Sentencing Act 1991 does not apply to VCAT contempt proceedings. The contempt power must not be used for extraneous purposes such as compelling a person to permanently abandon their profession.