A judge's indication during a Prasad submission that a particular matter is not a proper particular of a charge does not constitute a representation that evidence on that topic will not be relied upon for any purpose, including intent and credit. An incorrect factual finding by an inferior court will not constitute jurisdictional error where the finding is not critical to the decision and the decision is supported by other sufficient factual findings. The question whether a factual error by a court (as opposed to an administrative tribunal) can constitute jurisdictional error was left open.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.