Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Tkacz v WA [2005] WASCA 108 — Appeal Against Conviction & Criminal Code (WA) — Barrister AI

Tkacz v WA

[2005] WASCA 108

Western Australia Court of Appeal

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal law and procedure - Appeal against conviction
1. - Whether miscarriage of justice from lack of compliance with s 611B of the
1. Criminal Code (WA) - Whether trial Judge should have directed jury on
1. s 24 of the Criminal Code - Whether trial Judge disparaged witness -

Case Details

Citation[2005] WASCA 108

CourtWASCA

JurisdictionWestern Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.

3 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by7

2010La Bianca v The State of Western Australia [No 2]WASCA 204
2007Hayley v The State of Western AustraliaWASCA 130
2007Sherwood v The State of Western AustraliaWASCA 81
2006Re Tkacz; Ex Parte TkaczWASC 315
and 3 more after sign-in

Relies on15

2005Beamish v The QueenWASCA 62
2003Mallard v The QueenWASCA 296
2001Mathews v The QueenWASCA 264
2000RPS v RHCA 3
and 11 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works