A solicitor conducting bankruptcy searches who receives results showing a person with the same surname but different first names as the person under investigation cannot reasonably assume the two are the same person without further inquiry, particularly where the client has emphasised the importance of the bankruptcy question. However, even where such negligence is established, causation will fail where the plaintiff's pattern of conduct — investing large sums before seeking advice, rejecting professional financial advice, and continuing to invest beyond the scope of the retainer — demonstrates on the balance of probabilities that the plaintiff would have proceeded regardless. A delay of 21 months in delivering judgment does not require appellate intervention where the reasons demonstrate the trial judge retained a full and clear understanding of the evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.