The Queen v Whittington

[2006] NTSC 65

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › motion to quash indictment for failure to provide particulars
3. › police officer in the execution of his duties- whether accused can rely on s 26 of the Code
4. › whether act was authorised
5. › whether particulars of why the act was not authorised required to be given
6. › motion dismissed
1. Criminal Code (NT) s 26(1), s 26(1)(a), s 26(1)(b), s 29(2)(b), s 27, s 28, s 29, s 408
1. Police Administration Act s 25, s 26, s 27, s 28
1. Cintana v Burgoyne [2003] NTSC 106; (2003) 13 NTLR 130

Citation[2006] NTSC 65

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in