Muir v Dixon [2006] NTSC 69 — Justices & Appeal Against Conviction — Barrister AI
← Back
Muir v Dixon
[2006] NTSC 69
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+1 more
Appeal
›
JUSTICES
Appeal against conviction
›
whether unsafe and unsatisfactory
›
whether findings of fact supported by the evidence
›
election of accused not to give evidence
›
inferences that may be drawn
Appeal against sentence
›
whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive
›
appellant not entitled to discount for an early plea
›
no indications of remorse
›
sentence not manifestly excessive
›
whether order for restitution ought to have been made
Appeal allowed - Restitution order set aside
Case Details
Citation
[2006] NTSC 69
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works