R v Libke

[2006] QCA 242

Queensland Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law - Appeal and New Trial and Inquiry After Conviction - Appeal and New Trial - Particular Grounds - Conduct of Legal Practitioners
2. › where defendant gave evidence - during cross-examination prosecutor was sarcastic and made comments throughout the cross-examination
3. › where prosecutor incorrectly suggested to the defendant that his evidence on a peripheral matter was an invention
4. › where defendant not deprived of the right to a fair trial
1. Criminal Law
2. › APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
3. › APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE
4. › APPEAL BY CONVICTED PERSONS
5. › APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE
6. › whether sentence of eight years’ imprisonment for each of one count of rape and two counts of unlawful carnal knowledge of an intellectually impaired person manifestly excessive
7. › where sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment substituted on each count
1. Criminal Code 1899 (Qld), s 24, s 216(4),s 216(6), s 229F,
1. s 349(2)(b)

Citation[2006] QCA 242

CourtQCA

JurisdictionQueensland

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in