Jury acquittals on some counts and convictions on others against the same complainant are not necessarily inconsistent where cross-examination established a basis for the jury to doubt the complainant's account on the acquitted counts specifically (here, possible 'doubling up' of events) while remaining satisfied on the convicted counts. Head sentences of 15-15.5 years imprisonment were upheld for serial predatory rape by two offenders involving weapon threats against two separate victims, where the violence was limited to the sexual offending itself.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.