Where a parallel investigation in another jurisdiction has not resulted in charges, the trial judge is not required to inform the jury of that fact; a clear direction not to speculate about the outcome of the investigation is sufficient. Portions of police interviews in which an accused speculates about a complainant's motives for fabrication, without those speculations being mixed with admissions, are self-serving and inadmissible at the instance of the accused, though the doctrine of recent invention may provide a basis for their admission if properly invoked.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 11 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.