The parity principle may require reduction of an otherwise appropriate sentence where a co-offender has received a remarkably lenient sentence, even where the appellant's sentence is not itself manifestly excessive. The touchstone remains the avoidance of a justifiable sense of injustice. Where the co-offender's sentence is lenient and the offenders differ significantly in culpability, criminal history, and rehabilitation prospects, a greater disparity in sentences is required.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 15 later cases that cite this judgment.