Defence counsel's failure to make submissions on the availability of the s 17 discretion not to record a conviction can constitute an error warranting appellate intervention, even where the error is not attributable to the sentencing magistrate. Immigration consequences of a conviction should not be the balancing factor in exercising the s 17 discretion, but a person may be eligible for the discretion regardless of their immigration status where other relevant factors support it.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.