A newspaper article that contains unequivocal statements of guilt in its headline and caption, combined with statements of suspicion in the body text, is capable of conveying an imputation of guilt where the layout and emphasis given to the headline and caption mean the ordinary reasonable reader would not necessarily understand the article as conveying only suspicion. Where reasonable persons may differ, the question must be left to the jury. The 'bane and antidote' principle does not automatically apply where the body text qualifies the headline.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 10 later cases that cite this judgment.