Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Bauskis v Adams [2007] NSWCA 293 — Imperial, Colonial, State Relationships — Barrister AI

Bauskis v Adams

[2007] NSWCA 293

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Constitutional Law
2. › Imperial, colonial, state relationships
3. › imperial legislation
4. › inherited law
5. › adopted law
6. › applicability of statute law
7. › Habeas Corpus Act 1640 (Imp), s 6, s 8
8. › Imperial Acts Application Act 1969, s 6.
1. Administrative Law
2. › Prerogative writs and orders
3. › habeas corpus
4. › appropriateness of remedy
5. › whether habeas corpus or appeal appropriate
6. › where writ sought on order made by superior court of general jurisdiction
1. Procedure
2. › Courts and judges generally
3. › judges
4. › immunity from proceedings
5. › alleged improper denial of right to trial by jury
6. › where claimant charged with contempt of court and served sentence of imprisonment
7. › Habeas Corpus Act 1640 (Imp), s 4, s 6
8. › Imperial Acts Application Act 1969, s 43

Case Details

Citation[2007] NSWCA 293

CourtNSWCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on7

2005Fingleton v RHCA 34
1999Re Colina; Ex parte TorneyHCA 57
1995Witham v HollowayHCA 3
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works