Mastronardi v NSW

[2007] NSWCA 54

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › Civil appeals
3. › Appeal from trial by judge alone
4. › Factual errors in reasoning
5. › Whether trial judge erred in rejecting plaintiff's evidence based on adverse credibility findings
6. › Whether factual errors in reaching credibility conclusions constituted appellable error
1. Appeal
2. › Civil appeals
3. › Delay in delivering judgment
4. › Effect on appellate review
5. › Whether delay of 18 months supports inference of judicial error
6. › Whether assumptions in favour of trial judge's reasoning displaced by delay
1. Appeal
2. › Civil appeals
3. › New trial
4. › Substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice
5. › Whether miscarriage established where evidence misapprehended and not properly considered
6. › Whether miscarriage limited to assessment of ultimate outcome
7. › Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A
8. › Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 51, r 23
1. Negligence
2. › Duty of care
3. › Prisoners
4. › Duty of State to protect prisoners from assault by fellow inmates
5. › Whether prison officers had or ought to have had knowledge of threat
6. › Crown Proceedings Act 1988 (NSW)

Quick Take

Where a trial judge delivers a significantly delayed judgment (15 months or more) containing factual errors in credibility reasoning, the appellate court will not assume the errors were mere carelessness, that the judge had other persuasive explanations, or that an unarticulated balancing process was undertaken. A failure to provide a fair trial where evidence was misapprehended and not properly relied upon constitutes a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice for the purposes of ordering a new trial, and that phrase is not limited to an assessment of the ultimate outcome of the case.