A bare assertion by a forensic psychiatrist that mental illness probably played a direct role in offending, without elaboration of the reasoning basis, is insufficient to discharge the offender's burden of establishing a causal connection between mental illness and criminal behaviour for sentencing purposes. The inadequacy is compounded where the offender has declined to provide the psychiatrist with an account of the offences.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.