Vehicular driveways, pedestrian access ways, travelators, car parking, and landscaped forecourt areas that are integral to and serve the end of enabling a retail development (supermarket) are properly characterised as being for the purpose of 'shop', not 'roads', even where they also serve residential uses. Such facilities cannot be separately characterised as 'roads' to avoid zoning prohibitions where they are integrated and indivisible parts of the retail development. The correctness of Argyropoulos v Canterbury Municipal Council (1988) 66 LGRA 202 was left open.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 127 later cases that cite this judgment.
12 of the 127 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.