› injunctions to restrain “use” of information - whether “use” injunction should be granted when it might inhibit party in commencing other proceedings
› whether exception on restraint to permit use to inform recipient’s decision to commence other proceedings should be permitted
› held, it should not
› whether use injunction granted only where use would involve further dissemination
› held it is not so limited.
Jurisdiction
› Cross-vesting
› transfer of proceedings
› between Supreme Courts of States
› relevant considerations
› where defendants resident in Victoria, cause of action arises in Victoria, threatened breach is in Victoria, and issues will arise as to conduct of persons involved in previous proceedings in Supreme Court of Victoria
› held, Victoria is the natural forum.
Case Details
Citation[2007] NSWSC 230
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 28 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 28 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.
