R v Scotty [2007] NTSC 43 — Admissions & Alleged Lies — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Scotty
[2007] NTSC 43
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+16 more
Evidence
›
Admissions
›
Aboriginal of low intelligence and brain damage
›
whether suspected of commission of an offence
›
whether caution required to be given
›
whether statement should have been required to be taped
›
whether admissible
Evidence
›
admissions
›
Aboriginal of low intelligence and brain damage suspected of murder
›
formal record of interview conducted without prisoner’s friend
›
Anunga guidelines not complied with
›
record of interview conducted after suspect had previously exercised the right to remain silent
›
whether voluntary or should be excluded in the exercise of discretion
Evidence
›
alleged lies
›
whether admissible as evidence of guilt
Statutes:
Case Details
Citation
[2007] NTSC 43
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works