For the purposes of s 126(4) of the Land Title Act 1994 (Qld), a proceeding to establish a caveatable interest may be started by amendment to existing proceedings, not only by filing fresh proceedings. It is sufficient if the relief sought is stated in the statement of claim attached to the claim, and it is not necessary that the claim itself state the relief. However, r 387(3) UCPR does not give retrospective effect to amendments for the purposes of the three-month period under s 126(4). A caveat over a whole lot is not too wide where the interest claimed is in a portion not yet subdivided, following Re Henderson's Caveat.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 18 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 18 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.