Skipper v Resource Planning and Development Commission

[2007] TASSC 83

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Administrative Law
2. › Judicial review
3. › Grounds of review
4. › Procedural fairness
5. › Existence of obligation
6. › Particular cases
7. › Application for rezoning
8. › Matters raised in decision-maker's officer's report
9. › Duty to give applicant opportunity to comment and provide further material.
1. Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550; Broussard v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 21 FCR 472; [name withheld] v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1991] FCA 389; (1991) 31 FCR 100; Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57, referred to.
1. Aust Dig Administrative Law [1050]
1. Environment and Planning
2. › Environmental planning
3. › Planning schemes and instruments
4. › Tasmania
5. › Amendments to planning schemes
6. › Procedural fairness
7. › Resource Planning and Development Commission
8. › Comments in report of officer of Commission
9. › Duty to give applicant opportunity to respond.

Citation[2007] TASSC 83

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in