A compromise agreement reached in Family Provision Act proceedings, made by an executor with legal advice and in exercise of the statutory power of compromise, will ordinarily have an extremely strong claim for attention among the relevant circumstances under s 9(3). The court retains power to reject a compromise where the sum is too high or too low, but will only do so where the compromise fails to effectuate the policies of the Act, amounts to an abuse of process, or otherwise offends public policy. The interests of beneficiaries who receive assets only through an intermediate estate have a weaker claim to consideration than direct beneficiaries of the deceased's estate.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 161 later cases that cite this judgment.
9 of the 161 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.