Where the evidence establishes that funds are available to fund community-based treatment for a serious sex offender and the court has determined that an extended supervision order is appropriate, the court is entitled to assume the Executive will act rationally in releasing those funds; any other decision would be irrational in the administrative law sense. A supervision order condition requiring treatment 'if it is made available' does not render the order futile, even if funding has not yet been committed. The inability to presently administer anti-libidinal medication does not preclude release under supervision where the condition is framed contingently.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.