Catherine Carey v Michael Antoska [2008] NSWSC 1389 — Costs — Barrister AI
← Back
Catherine Carey v Michael Antoska
[2008] NSWSC 1389
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
COSTS - where proceedings settled - plaintiff obtained both interlocutory and final relief - costs follow event but with reduction to reflect plaintiff's unreasonable demands.
Case Details
Citation
[2008] NSWSC 1389
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
