Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Proudman v Dickason [2008] NSWSC 681 — De Facto Relationships — Barrister AI

Proudman v Dickason

[2008] NSWSC 681

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Family Law
2. › de facto relationships
3. › property adjustment
4. › greater financial contribution by man
5. › greater non-financial contribution by woman
6. › relevance of expenditure on gambling and alcohol consumption
7. › relevance of superannuation
8. › superannuation relevant to the subsidiary consideration of parties’ needs and means
1. Family Law
2. › de facto relationships
3. › property adjustment
4. › costs
5. › costs follow the event
6. › ‘the event’ may be ascertained in a variety of ways
7. › pleadings and settlement offers will assist in determining ‘the event’
8. › plaintiff did not achieve the degree of adjustment sought by the pleadings
9. › plaintiff’s settlement offer more reasonable
10. › defendant to pay 50 percent of the plaintiff’s costs

Case Details

Citation[2008] NSWSC 681

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2013Starr-Diamond v DiamondNSWCA 7
2012Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus DiamondNSWSC 675
2010Ryan v KalocsayNSWSC 620

Relies on8

2008Baker v TowleNSWCA 73
2008Hayes v MarquisNSWCA 10
2007Manns v KennedyNSWCA 217
2007Dunstan v Rickwood (No 2)NSWCA 266
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works