Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Hamod v NSW (No 11) [2008] NSWSC 967 — Judges & Disqualification — Barrister AI

Hamod v NSW (No 11)

[2008] NSWSC 967

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Judges
1. disqualification
1. apprehended bias
1. conduct of judge in relation to litigant in person

Case Details

Citation[2008] NSWSC 967

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 21 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by21

2026Ullah v HalabiNSWCATAP 167
2026Grabovsky v WrightNSWCATAP 89
2026Thompson v Lane (No 2)FCA 86
2025Edwards v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited (No 9)FCA 1042
and 17 more after sign-in

Relies on18

2008Jae Kyung LEE v Bob Chae-Sang CHA & ORSNSWCA 13
2008Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 10)NSWSC 611
2008Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 9)NSWSC 518
2008Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 8)NSWSC 125
and 14 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works