Haruma v McCarthy [2008] NTSC 18 — Appeal Against Sentence & Sentencing Act S 63(5) — Barrister AI
← Back
Haruma v McCarthy
[2008] NTSC 18
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+4 more
Justices Appeal
›
Appeal against sentence
›
whether the sentences were manifestly excessive
›
whether the sentencing magistrate erred in not backdating the sentence of imprisonment to the time the appellant was apprehended
›
appeal allowed
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 16A(2), s 16E, s 17A, s 20(1)(b),
Fisheries Management Act 1991 (Cth) s 100(2), s 100B(1); s 101AA(1)
Migration Act (Cth) s 5, s 164B(3); s 250
Case Details
Citation
[2008] NTSC 18
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works