Suriyadi v Bravos [2008] NTSC 19 — Appeal Against Sentence — Barrister AI
← Back
Suriyadi v Bravos
[2008] NTSC 19
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Justices Appeal
›
Appeal against sentence
›
whether the sentencing magistrate failed to consider or did insufficiently consider the absence of criminal antecedents
›
whether the sentences were manifestly excessive
›
weight to be given to personal and general deterrence in sentencing
›
whether the sentencing magistrate erred in not backdating the sentence of imprisonment to the time the appellant was apprehended
›
appeal allowed
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 20(1)(b)
Fisheries Management Act 1991 (Cth) s 100B(1), s 101AA(1), 164B(3)
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 164B(3), s 250
Case Details
Citation
[2008] NTSC 19
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
