› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL
› PARTICULAR GROUNDS
› MISDIRECTION AND NON-DIRECTION
› GENERAL MATTERS
› PRESENTATION OF DEFENCE CASE AND CROWN CASE AND REVIEW OF EVIDENCE
› where the trial judge allowed the admission of unparticularised evidence of uncharged acts of unlawful sexual activity by the appellant against the
complainant
› where the evidence was uncorroborated
› where the trial judge directed the jury as to the dangers of such evidence and the need to scrutinise it with real care
› whether such evidence was properly put to the jury as evidence that may be relied upon in establishing a contravention of s 229B(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld)
Criminal Law
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL
› PARTICULAR GROUNDS
› UNREASONABLE OR INSUPPORTABLE VERDICT
› WHERE APPEAL DISMISSED
› where appellant convicted on one charge of maintaining a sexual relationship with a child under 16 years and acquitted on two counts of the rape of the same
child
› whether the conviction on the maintaining count is inconsistent and irreconcilable with the acquittals on the rape counts
Case Details
Citation[2008] QCA 107
CourtQCA
JurisdictionQueensland
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.
