› where applicant disciplined by first respondent for misconduct while working as an Acute Care Paramedic in the employ of the Queensland Ambulance Service (“QAS”)
› where applicant appealed to second respondent
› where second respondent did not define term ‘misconduct’ or explicitly consider its application to the applicant’s conduct
› whether second respondent failed to take relevant consideration into account
Administrative Law
› JUDICIAL REVIEW
› GROUNDS OF REVIEW
› GENERALLY
› where competing expert opinions
› where majority of evidence indicates applicant failed to provide standard of care expected by QAS
› whether sufficient evidence for second respondent to be reasonably satisfied that applicant’s actions amounted to misconduct
