Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Murray v Maingay

[2008] TASSC 18

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Magistrates
2. › Appeals from and control over magistrates
3. › Tasmania
4. › Motion to review
5. › The hearing
6. › Generally
7. › Adequacy of magistrate's reasons for decision
8. › Whether magistrate adequately dealt with risk inherent in identification evidence.
1. [name withheld] v [name withheld] B41/1995, followed.
1. Aust Dig Magistrates [272]

Case Details

Citation[2008] TASSC 18

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by4

2020J J M H v BondeTASSC 24
2015Lane v BrearleyTASSC 59
2014Caccavo v CollinsTASFC 7
2014Hindrum v LaneTASFC 5

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works

Murray v Maingay [2008] TASSC 18 — Magistrates & Aust Dig Magistrates [272] — Barrister AI