Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Martin v Tas [2008] TASSC 66 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

Martin v Tas

[2008] TASSC 66

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Jurisdiction, practice and procedure
3. › Summing up
4. › Need for warning pursuant to Evidence Act 2001, s165
5. › Whether witness may reasonably be supposed to be criminally concerned in the events giving rise to the proceeding
6. › Whether request for warning made
7. › Effect of failure to give a warning.
1. Evidence Act 2001 (Tas), s165.
1. Kanaan v R [2006] NSWCCA 109, considered.
1. Aust Dig Criminal Law [802]

Case Details

Citation[2008] TASSC 66

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2023Vincent v Victorian WorkCover Authority (Ruling)VCC 1692
2015Wilson v The QueenVSCA 211

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works