In a circumstantial evidence case, a jury may conclude that a weapon found in the accused's possession is the same weapon used in an offence based not only on descriptive similarities but also on the circumstances of acquisition, retention, and movement of the weapon. A jury is not constrained by the accused's own account of dissimilarities between the weapons. The applicant's account in a police interview may be found to be a deliberate lie told out of consciousness of guilt where the account involves progressive elaboration and shifts in explanation, even though the identification of the lie's recipient was expressed equivocally.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.