An application to re-open an appellate decision before orders are perfected will be dismissed where the applicant seeks to re-argue matters already considered and determined, even where the applicant identifies factual errors, if those errors are immaterial to the court's conclusions. The jurisdiction to re-open requires exceptional circumstances and will not be exercised as a backdoor method for unsuccessful litigants to re-argue their cases.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.