Recorded telephone conversations using coded language, combined with evidence of the appellant giving instructions about payment collection, making visual assessments of the purchaser, counting the money, and querying the amount paid, were sufficient circumstantial evidence to establish participation in a joint criminal enterprise to sell drugs, excluding the alternative inference of mere accessory after the fact.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.