A shared anti-competitive purpose is not required for multi-party agreements under s 45 TPA; it suffices that one party responsible for the impugned provision had the proscribed substantial purpose ([name withheld], [name withheld] dissenting).
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 79 later cases that cite this judgment.
9 of the 79 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.