Moveable dwellings excluded from the definition of 'building' in s 4 of the EP&A Act do not require construction certificates under Part 4A, and an accredited certifier's satisfaction with compliance with development consent conditions is irrelevant where no construction certificate is required. An approval body's variation of conditions under its own legislation does not constitute a modification of a development consent for the purposes of the EP&A Act; such modification can only occur under s 96. A 'catch all' phrase in a development consent purporting to incorporate all supplementary information received by Council is not a legitimate method of incorporating unspecified documents into a consent.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 52 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 52 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.