Mitreski v His Eminence Metropolitan Petar the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand [2009] NSWCA 319 — Appeals — Barrister AI
Mitreski v His Eminence Metropolitan Petar the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand
› leave to appeal - appeal from determination of separate questions
› full disposition of hearing of first instance trial before exercise of the appellate jurisdiction
PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - effect of judgments - determination of separate questions - whether reasons of trial judge went beyond scope of separate questions
› whether reasons foreclosed issues in the proceedings
› whether failure to afford procedural fairness
› answers given to separate questions do not preclude any aspect of further hearing at first instance
PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - effect of judgments - determination of separate questions - whether trial judge failed to answer many of the questions placed before him in the separate issues
› unanswered questions remain live in the litigation at first instance
› no need to invoke the appellate jurisdiction
APPEALS - application for leave to cross-appeal
› revival of application previously dismissed by Court of Appeal
› previous orders and declarations - whether orders and declarations below interlocutory
› relevance of evidence for rest of hearing
› whether answers to questions will preclude evidence being led
Case Details
Citation[2009] NSWCA 319
CourtNSWCA
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.