Fonseka v Epic Holels Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWIRComm 178 — Unfair Contract & Legal Representatives — Barrister AI
← Back
Fonseka v Epic Holels Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2009] NSWIRComm 178
Industrial Relations Commission of NSW
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Dismissal of Proceedings
›
unfair contract
›
want of prosecution
›
applicant’s failure to progress proceedings
›
principles concerning case management and administration of justice
›
effect of delayed proceedings on litigants, the court and the public
›
applicant afforded opportunities to progress claim
›
no advancement in claim for extended period of time
›
proceedings dismissed for want of prosecution.
Want of Prosecution
›
unfair contract
›
dismissal of proceedings
›
applicant’s failure to progress proceedings
›
principles concerning case management and administration of justice
›
effect of delayed proceedings on litigants, the court and the public
›
applicant afforded opportunities to progress claim
›
no advancement in claim for extended period of time
›
proceedings dismissed for want of prosecution.
Legal Representatives
Mr G H Healey, solicitor (Applicant)
Case Details
Citation
[2009] NSWIRComm 178
Court
NSWIRComm
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
